|
|
Post by lew on Mar 23, 2011 17:09:24 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by crumbs on Mar 23, 2011 17:22:38 GMT
Whoops. It happens to us all. Typical of the Wail to say he looks 'stressed' just cos he's having a puff. He doesn't look remotely stressed to me.
Anyway, it looks like a rather large motorbike to an untrained eye such as mine - anyone know which of his bikes it is?
|
|
|
|
Post by meimichan on Mar 23, 2011 17:25:08 GMT
RECENTLY wrote a column? It says right at the top that it was first published in 2005. And in the newspaper world, that's recent?
Reading comprehension. Give it a try, Daily Fail.
|
|
|
|
Post by dit on Mar 23, 2011 19:44:12 GMT
Since when did he become "the burly TV presenter"?
|
|
|
|
Post by devil-may-care on Mar 23, 2011 19:50:55 GMT
Since when did he become "the burly TV presenter"? I was thinking that myself. I wouldn't describe James as "burly". Perhaps they are unsure of the meaning of that word. |
|
|
|
Post by jacqui on Mar 23, 2011 20:06:40 GMT
Good old 'wail'  poor james though, there are some bar-stewards out there unfortunately  ...and why make an issue over him having a ciggy for crying out loud |
|
|
|
Post by jacqui on Mar 23, 2011 20:12:28 GMT
bur·ly/ˈbərlç/
Adjective: (of a person) Large and strong; heavily builtJames..... burly??? As for heavily built - have they got the right bloke  Large and strong - I feel some research coming on ladies 
|
|
|
|
Post by dit on Mar 23, 2011 22:19:05 GMT
From Dictionary.com
bur·ly
large in bodily size; stout; sturdy.
stocky, brawny, thickset, beefy, hefty.
This, about a man who one of my friends refers to as, "I couldn't fancy him; he's too thin and too pretty".
?
|
|
|
|
Post by liverbird on Mar 23, 2011 22:46:50 GMT
Another first for the Daily Fail..... I wouldn't trust them to publish the correct date . Despite his mishap he looked pretty damn fine to me. ;D Had he gotten his hands on the prat I think the dark side of May might've made an appearence. Light the blue touch paper and stand well back! The bike looks a bit tasty. |
|
|
|
Post by xjsarah on Mar 23, 2011 22:47:28 GMT
Hmm, that was a well-researched article....NOT!! Talk about cobbling something together to try to make a story out of nothing! That sort of 'journalism' really annoys me. Edit: I posted that comment before rereading the article, and I think the article has been altered since I read it earlier today. A lot of the poorly researched stuff appears to have been removed. Hmm.... |
|
|
|
Post by dit on Mar 23, 2011 23:15:05 GMT
James does have friends at the Fail. After all, who can forget the (in)famous 'Satanic Gynaecologist' photo-spread and the excellent article that went with it? There's been other sympathetic stuff too. Guess it depends which *cough* journalists are involved.
|
|
|
|
Post by devil-may-care on Mar 23, 2011 23:16:02 GMT
I agree with you, XJS. The article does appear to have different content. I also love how the price of the bike changes from 9700 to 9799 in just two paragraphs!  |
|
|
|
Post by lew on Mar 24, 2011 13:00:31 GMT
I see everything from the original article has been changed, so will the title. And I hope the scumbag who tried to nick said bike, ends up where the sun don't shine. |
|
|
|
Post by jacqui on Mar 24, 2011 13:11:04 GMT
thats too good for them Lew - wonder if there was CCTV in the area?? Nail the bar-stewards |
|
|
|
Post by morganstarr89 on Mar 24, 2011 21:19:14 GMT
I love how pissed off he looks and how he's smoking so camply lol.
|
|
I love a man who can handle a gun 
